Should we enforce stricter topics?

[admin Pronounshe/him]

Do we start to enforce stricter requirements in topics? I think this is better for the health of the site, but it requires engagement in multiple threads or they'll just die off, so it's a group effort. Looking at people's opinions.

Example if we were stricter:

Chart thread would remain chart focused, including JFAD charts (box office, RT)

Personal opinions, reviews and takes for JFAD should be housed in the JFAD thread.

Likewise, the LG7 thread and personal thread would take on a lot of the talk that happens here.

[Moonlight Shadow]

Honestly yes, a lot people on this forum are only here for news and charts numbers not getting the same meltdowns going over and over again every two posts over the same things.

Isn't it what atrl is made for ? 

 

[Ben PronounsHe/him/his]

On 10/1/2024 at 2:26 PM, Moonlight Shadow said:

Isn't it what atrl is made for ? 

 

ATRL is made for misogynistic stan wars and bullying.

OT: Given that most activity happens in one thread (even with the increased userbase), I'm not keen at all on removing posts/issuing warnings to those that don't post in a secific thread

[Dirkje PronounsShe/her/hers]

Tbh its quite normal for forums to have multiple threads. Just you guys got used to just one for so long, it looks like you forgot that. 
 

I think we found out the downside of having everything in one single thread. I agree with @admin’s idea.